Legal Opinion

Skehan v. Reed

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1933No. 2738Published

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT

The same transactions that are involved in this case were involved in Skehan v Larkin, 41 Oh Ap, 85 (11 Abs 449), where the facts are succinctly stated.

The court finds no prejudicial error in the case at bar except as to the amount of the judgment. The transfers were made by the decedent in her lifetime and the evidence fails to establish a cause of action under §10673, GC, for concealing, embezzling, etc., assets of the decedent, but does establish a cause of action under the Code of Civil Procedure. The court therefore was not authorized to add, under §10678, GC, ten percent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Skehan v. LarkinOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API