Legal Opinion
Tunnicliff v. COM., DEPT. OF PUBLIC WEL.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 18, 1978No. 531PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARSEN, Justice.
Appellants, Leon and Annabelle Tunnicliff, had been receiving federal assistance since April of 1973 under the now defunct Aid to Disabled assistance program. On January 1, 1974, they were transferred to the rolls of the Supplemental Security Income program (SSI), a program jointly administered by both federal and state governments. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383(c) (1974). On or about January 25, 1974, appellants informed their caseworker at the Bradford County Board of Assistance that they had not yet received their SSI check, and sought temporary assistance from the state…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Idaho Department of Employment v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Good v. WohlgemuthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Robert Tidwell v. Richard Schweiker, Etc., and Ivan Pavkovic, Etc., Robert Schreckenberg v. Richard S. Schweiker, Etc., and Ivan Pavkovic, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Moore v. ColauttiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- French v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services Finance & Support v. WilsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- 14 Collier bankr.cas.2d 599, Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,097 in Re Vazquez, Guerrero and Compton, Debtors. Vazquez, Agustin Guerrero, David R., and Compton, Barry A. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.