Legal Opinion

Pence v. Christman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1860PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Ohristman sued Penee upon two promissory notes, executed by the defendant to the plaintiff, one for $944, dated December 6, 1858, the other for $333 and 73 cents, dated May 6, 1858.

The defendant answered that the first mentioned note was-usurious, in this; that it was given in consideration of a note previously given by the defendant to one George O. Tyler, and by the latter transferred to the plaintiff without indorsement, for the sum of $800, which last mentioned note, as set out, was made payable on June 6, 1857; and it is averred that $144 of the note sued on was given for usurious…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shattuck v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Wright v. HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hambey v. HillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Benson v. McFaddenIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Blakeley v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API