Pence v. Christman
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Warren Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.
Ohristman sued Penee upon two promissory notes, executed by the defendant to the plaintiff, one for $944, dated December 6, 1858, the other for $333 and 73 cents, dated May 6, 1858.
The defendant answered that the first mentioned note was-usurious, in this; that it was given in consideration of a note previously given by the defendant to one George O. Tyler, and by the latter transferred to the plaintiff without indorsement, for the sum of $800, which last mentioned note, as set out, was made payable on June 6, 1857; and it is averred that $144 of the note sued on was given for usurious…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shattuck v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Wright v. HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hambey v. HillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Benson v. McFaddenIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Blakeley v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902