Legal Opinion

Hitner v. Diamond State Steel Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided August 8, 1913No. 200PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Henry A. Hitner and Joseph G. Hitner, trading as Henry A. Hitner’s Sons, against the Diamond State Steel Company. On exceptions to master’s report.

1Opinion of the Court

BRADFORD, District Judge.

This case has been heard on exceptions taken, on the one hand, by James P. Winchester and Howard T. Wallace, receivers of the Diamond State Steel Company, hereinafter referred to as the steel company, and, on the other, by sundry bondholders and general creditors of that company, to the report of William G. Maliaffy, special master, to whom the accounts of the said receivers and1 certain matters relating to the adjustment, settlement and distribution of the estate of the steel company were referred. The order of reference to the special master was made July 27, 1910,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Davis v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Callaghan v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Camden v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Medsker v. BonebrakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Willoughby v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Haines v. Buckeye Wheel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API