Legal Opinion

Hone v. Ammons

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1852PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This cause was heard at May terra, 1849, of the Clinton Circuit Court, before Underwood, Judge. The action was founded on a promissory note.

Read the full summary

This cause was heard at May terra, 1849, of the Clinton Circuit Court, before Underwood, Judge. The action was founded on a promissory note. The second plea was, that the note was executed and delivered for the sale of a certain negro man, then running at large in the State, who was alleged falsely and fraudulently to be a servant for life, and that plaintiff had a good right, title, and claim to said negro; whereas, in truth and in fact, said negro was not a servant for life, but was a free man; and that said note was made and executed for no good or valuable consideration. The verdict and…

1Opinion of the Court

Catón, J.

The evidence shows that a negro was seen in Clinton county the day on which the note was given; that Hone claimed that he was his runaway slave. For this negro the note was given. The defence set up by the second plea was, that the negro was a free man. I think, beyond all question, the evidence sustained this plea. The negro being in this State, the presumption of law was that he was a free man. Such have been the repeated and uniform decision of this court, and I do not feel called upon to vindicate its propriety. The moment the defendant proved that the negro was on our soil, he…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Collins v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Schlee v. GuckenheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Roundtree v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API