Acedo v. State, Department of Public Welfare
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Judge.
The only issue presented by this appeal is whether a natural mother, who voluntarily executes a consent authorizing the placement of her child for adoption, may regain her child after the child has been placed in an adoptive home, solely upon the ground that at the time she signed the requisite consent form she had an unexpressed misconception as to the form’s legal significance, which misconception was not the result of any improper actions on the part of the adoption agency. We hold that on the facts here presented, she may not.
The natural mother, hereinafter referred to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re the Adoption of HolmanArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- List Adoption CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Adoption of PitcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- In Re Adoption of HammerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Batton v. MassarSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Golz v. Children's Bureau of New Orleans, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- In Re the Adoption of Baby Girl K.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Anonymous v. AnonymousCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. B-7087Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re the Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action No. 3824Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.