Legal Opinion
United States v. 40 Acres of Land Situate In Nenana Recording Precinct
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided March 6, 1958No. Civ. No. A-12883PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGE, District Judge.
Plaintiff in this action seeks to acquire by condemnation proceedings certain property owned by the defendant Dan T. Kennedy, consisting of a homestead and improvements thereon, described as “Tract A” in the complaint herein, located within the exterior boundaries of Mount McKinley National Park. Defendant filed an answer raising objections to the taking, pursuant to Rule 71A (e), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C. At the time of the trial defendant raised jurisdictional questions relating to such taking, in substance as follows: (1) There was no allegation in the complaint…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. ThrelkeldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
- Polson Logging Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. BradfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
- United States v. Dan T. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. 40 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. BradfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
- Transportation-Communication Employees Union v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966