Scott v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
Following a jury trial, Travis Lamont Scott was convicted of trafficking in cocaine. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in admitting similar transaction evidence, denying his motion to suppress, and presenting an indictment to the jury that contained the names of several other persons who were not on trial. Scott also contends that his trial counsel was ineffective. We discern no error and affirm.
Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence reveals that Damon Nelson asked Antonio Milligan for the name of a person who could sell him cocaine.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Benford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Nicholson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Benton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Manzione v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Sheppard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Fleming v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- LANHAM v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Claritt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.