Legal Opinion

Schuhmacher Co. v. Holcomb

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 6, 1943PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

Appellees, Paul B. Holcomb and Maurine Holcomb (Paul B. Holcomb suing individually and as next friend of his minor daughter Maurine), sued appellant, the Schuh-macher Company, to recover damages for injuries sustained as the result of a collision between the automobile in which ap-pellees were riding and the truck of appellant, driven by an employee. Appellees alleged and the jury found that the collision and resulting injuries to them were caused by certain negligent acts of the employee of appellant in the operation of the truck at the time of the collision. Appellant alleged…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Northeast Texas Motor Lines, Inc. v. HodgesTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. El Paso Electric Co. v. LeeperTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. MaddinTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Ener v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. North East Texas Motor Lines, Inc. v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schuhmacher Co. v. HolcombTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Houston v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Buss v. RobisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Ft. Worth & Denver City Ry. Co. v. LooneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Siratt v. Worth Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API