Legal Opinion

Martorano v. Hughes

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 3, 1966No. 62 C 1063Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DOOLING, District Judge.

Plaintiff has sued to restrain the enforcement of an award made under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq.) on the ground that the employer and employee relationship did not exist between plaintiff and the decedent, Richard Wipperman, whose death gave rise to the award. As Judge Rosling pointed out at an earlier stage of the case (222 F.Supp. 789, 790), if the action tested only the existence of substantial evidence to support the Deputy Commissioner’s holding that the employment relation existed, the defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Yeaton and Others, of the Schooner General Pinkney and Cargo v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  4. Hepburn & Dundas v. AuldSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  5. Untersinger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API