Legal Opinion

Noell v. Noell

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided July 23, 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court of the city of Radford, rendered June 25, 1895, in an action of assumpsit, wherein the plaintiff in error was the plaintiff, and the defendant in error was the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by the plaintiff in error in the Hustings court of the city of Radford, to recover of the defendant in error a balance of $517.00 as due on the price and value of certain goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant on the 21st day of November, 1891.

The memorandum of the plaintiff’s attorney directing the writ to issue to the 2nd November rules, and the declaration, were filed on the 19th November, 1894, which was the second rule day of the court. The writ accordingly issued, was executed and returned on that day. November 21, 1894, a bill…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goodell's Ex'ors v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Burdick v. GreenNew York Supreme Court · 1820

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Feary v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Southern Sand & Gravel Co. v. Massaponax Sand & Gravel Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  3. Moore v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  4. Davis v. McCallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  5. Peters v. HangerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API