Sanford v. Safford
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Dodge county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Buckham, J.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appeal is from a judgment entered in an action for the partition-of certain land, and the only question is whether the conclusions of law result front the findings of fact.
The essential facts as found by the court are as follows: The forty-acre tract of land in question was patented to the heirs of Augustus Miller. Through certain conveyances James B. Miller, as one of the heirs, became the owner of an undivided three-fourths interest in the land. The other one-fourth interest was in Helen B. Miller. On July 9, 1872, James B. Miller executed to one Mary Huston a warranty deed which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gardiner v. HintonMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
- Hanson v. IngwaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Ricker v. ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Stovall v. JudahMississippi Supreme Court · 1897
- Chapman v. KullmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Taylor v. EdgertonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919