State v. Hare
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:
T1 Nathan Hare sold marijuana three times to a confidential informant working for the police. Hare was charged with three counts of distributing a controlled substance in a drug-free zone. At Hare's request, his case was tried as a bench trial, and the judge found him guilty on all counts. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred by allowing him to waive his right to a jury trial and by failing to schedule his trial within thirty days upon Hare's request. He also argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance in a number of ways.
12 We conclude that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bresee v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Bresee v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016