Legal Opinion

State v. Hare

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 23, 2015No. 20120701-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:

T1 Nathan Hare sold marijuana three times to a confidential informant working for the police. Hare was charged with three counts of distributing a controlled substance in a drug-free zone. At Hare's request, his case was tried as a bench trial, and the judge found him guilty on all counts. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred by allowing him to waive his right to a jury trial and by failing to schedule his trial within thirty days upon Hare's request. He also argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance in a number of ways.

12 We conclude that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bresee v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  2. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  3. Bresee v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API