Legal Opinion · Dissent

Woodruff v. Wallace

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 27, 1895Published

Error from the District. Court of Oklahoma County. The opinion sufficiently states the facts.

1Dissent

Dissenting opinion by

Bierer, J.:

In my view of the law, this is another extension by this court of the proceeding by injunction to a class of cases in which neither the law or equity ever contemplated it should be invoked, and as each encroachment is made by this so-called equity jurisdiction upon legal remedies, I feel it my duty to dissent from the action taken.

I am not conyinced either by the argument made, or the authorities citéd, by the court, that injunction is a proper remedy by which to dispossess one who is in the peaceable, and hitherto, rightful, possession of land. I have never…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. Thomson's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Walker v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
  3. Bodwell v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  4. Peckham v. FaughtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
  5. Downing v. ReevesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API