Woodruff v. Wallace
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District. Court of Oklahoma County. The opinion sufficiently states the facts.
1Dissent
Dissenting opinion by
Bierer, J.:
In my view of the law, this is another extension by this court of the proceeding by injunction to a class of cases in which neither the law or equity ever contemplated it should be invoked, and as each encroachment is made by this so-called equity jurisdiction upon legal remedies, I feel it my duty to dissent from the action taken.
I am not conyinced either by the argument made, or the authorities citéd, by the court, that injunction is a proper remedy by which to dispossess one who is in the peaceable, and hitherto, rightful, possession of land. I have never…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tayloe v. Thomson's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Walker v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
- Bodwell v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Peckham v. FaughtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
- Downing v. ReevesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.