Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1967No. 626PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

On the first occasion this matter was before us it was remanded to the trial court for the purpose of holding a hearing in conformity with Criminal Rule 35(b). 1 Originally appellant was tried upon a three-count indictment. After the state had presented its case in chief and appellant had testified, appellant withdrew his not-guilty plea to a forgery count and pled guilty thereto. At the time this matter was initially before us appellant had claimed

that he was coerced into withdrawing his plea of not guilty and entering a plea of guilty by his court appointed counsel, who…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. John Christopher DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  3. J. Paul Shelton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  4. Shelton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Ruben R. Cortez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Faulkner v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Stobaugh v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Berfield v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Robinson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API