Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Hamada

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1982No. 7316PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, J.

The sole question posed by this appeal is whether appellant has standing as a “person aggrieved” within the meaning of HRS § 91-14(a) of the Hawaii Administrative Procedure Act (“HAPA”) to seek judicial review of an administrative agency’s decision. We hold that he does not, and accordingly affirm the circuit court’s order dismissing his appeal.

I

This is the last of three appeals brought by Theodore B. Jordan to challenge the certification of service fees charged by appellee Hawaii Government Employees’ Association, Local 152, AFSCME, AFL-CIO (“HGEA”), pursuant to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Life of the Land v. LAND USE COM'N, ETC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  4. East Diamond Head Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Application of Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kona Old Hawaiian Trails Group Ex Rel. Serrano v. LymanHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Bush v. Hawaiian Homes CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. E & J Lounge Operating Co. v. Liquor Commission of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Ariyoshi v. Hawaii Public Employment Relations BoardHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Georgia Power Co. v. Campaign for a Prosperous GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API