Legal Opinion

Howard v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 25, 1989No. 1 CA-CV 88-072PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERBER, Judge.

The primary issue on appeal is whether a Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA) petition may be used to obtain a child support order where there is a prior domestic relations court order stating that neither parent shall pay child support.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Robert Richardson (appellant) and Joyce Howard (appellee) were divorced in Maricopa County in 1973. Pursuant to the divorce decree appellant was ordered to pay $30.00 per month per child to appellee as child support for the parties’ four minor children.

On September 1,1982, the divorce decree was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moffat v. MoffatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Arvayo v. GuerreroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  3. People Ex Rel. Oetjen v. OetjenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Commonwealth of Virginia v. AutryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Lamb v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  2. Washington v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API