Legal Opinion

State v. Hancock

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2016No. 39S05-1604-CR-182PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUCKER, Justice.

Concluding the burglary statute in this state is not substantially similar to the burglary statute of a sister jurisdiction, the trial court dismissed two counts of an information charging the defendant as a serious violent felon. Reaching the opposite conclusion, we reverse the trial court’s judgment.

*586Facts and Procedural History

Although the underlying facts are not completely clear, the record shows that on October 6, 2014, the State charged Frank Hancock in a multi-count information with two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon—level 4…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Daniel Lee Pierce v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Leonard L. Suggs v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Adams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. John E. Moriarity and Mae E. Moriarity v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In the Matter of the Supervised Estate of Gary D. Kent John David Kent and Kevin Kent, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Gary D. Kent Nicholas Kent and David Kent v. Cynthia KerrIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Alberto Baiza Rodriguez v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State of Maine v. Troy D. HasteySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  5. Akeem Daniels, Cameron Stingily, and Nicholas Stoner v. FanDuel, Inc. and DraftKings, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API