Legal Opinion

Doe v. Louisiana Board of Ethics

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 2013No. Nos. 2012-CA-1169, 2012-CA-1170PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL A. BONIN, Judge.

| ,The Board of Ethics in its capacity as the Supervisory Committee on Campaign *341Finance Disclosure authorized a confidential investigation into whether certain persons or entities were only nominal contributors to a political action committee that in turn had made substantial financial contributions to the campaign expenses of a particular candidate for public office. Based upon a signed, yet unsworn, complaint that referenced a specific campaign finance report of the PAC, and a brief reference to publicly available information from the Louisiana Secretary of State’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Wooley v. LucksingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  4. Guillory v. LeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  5. State v. PiazzaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Scarberry v. Entergy Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. State v. HurleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. A.S. v. D.S.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. LCR-M Ltd. Partnership v. Jim Hotard Properties, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Ellis v. Louisiana Board of EthicsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API