Legal Opinion

State v. Hazelton

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 21, 2009No. 2008-113PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

¶ 1. Defendant appeals his convictions and sentence arising from charges of sexual assault. On appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court erred by allowing the State to present its case to the jury as one involving two counts of sexual assault and allowing the jury to convict him on both counts, notwithstanding our decision in State v. Hazelton, 2006 VT 121, 181 Vt. 118, 915 A.2d 224 (Hazelton I)- Defendant also contends that the trial court erred by permitting the State to introduce certain expert testimony and by sentencing him to a greater prison term following his conviction after a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LumumbaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  2. State of West Virginia v. Nicholas VarlasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. Paul Bryan Thibodeau-O'ConnorSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API