Legal Opinion

Boehm v. Griebenow

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 18, 1898PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Replevin.—Trial in the Circuit Court of Cook Comity, on appeal from a justice of the peace; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding. Finding and judgment for defendant. Appeal by plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

The plaintiffs, Samuel 0. Boehm and Max S. Boehm, brought an action of replevin before a justice of the peace to recover a barrel of whisky from the defendant, Gus Griebenow, a constable who had seized it by virtue of an execution against the goods and chattels of Robert H. McCarthy.

There was a finding for the defendant and an appeal to the Circuit Court, where the cause was tried without a jury. The same finding was had there and judgment was rendered for the defendant.

Appellant’s theory is that the goods were consigned for sale, and not sold to McCarthy, and hence not subject to seizure by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chickering v. BastressIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Lonergan v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Bastress v. ChickeringAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  4. Davies v. PhillipsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888
  5. Rosencranz & Weber Co. v. HanchettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boening v. North American UnionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  2. Hercules Coal & Mining Co. v. FrazerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  3. Supreme Council American Legion of Honor v. StewartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  4. Conway v. Garden City P. & P. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  5. Scott v. MorrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API