Legal Opinion
State v. Kropke
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 30, 1973PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Botter, J. S. C.
This is a motion by defendant Esther Gottesman, pursuant to R. 3:15-2(b), to sever her trial from that of codefendants named in the same indictment. Her contention of improper joinder with codefendants is gov*415erned by R. 3 :7-7. She also contends that such joinder has a potential for undue prejudice. See R. 3 :15-2.
Count 10 of a 12-count indictment charges that defendant, between June 1970 and March 1971, knowingly and wilfully obtained over $2,000 from the County of Hudson to which she was not entitled because she rendered no services to the county “sufficient to entitle” her…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Schaffer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VarelliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Harry P. Hutul, Robert Sacks, Herbert Basan, Nancy Mitchell, and Vito LombardiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Donald G. King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SanchezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- State v. BellucciNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- State v. ReldanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- State v. SavageNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- State v. McMahonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.