Legal Opinion

Ward v. Shelby County

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided September 18, 2024No. 2:20-cv-02407Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ) SEDRIC WARD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 2:20-cv-02407 v. ) ) SHELBY COUNTY, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER CLARIFYING EVIDENTIARY BURDEN Before the Court is Defendant Shelby County’s (“Shelby County’s” or “Defendant’s”) Motion in Limine #5, filed on September 6, 2024. (ECF No. 232 at PageID 3475.) Defendant wishes to designate Plaintiff Sedric Ward (“Ward” or “Plaintiff”) as the party bearing the evidentiary burden. (Id.) Plaintiff filed his response on September 12, 2024. (ECF No. 235.) I. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wysocki v. International Business MacHine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. Eugene Pierce v. The Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., D/B/A Santa Fe Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Franklin Am. Mortg. Co. v. Univ. Nat'l Bank of LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. Sedric Ward v. Shelby County, Tenn.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API