Legal Opinion
Zendle v. Garfield Aniline Works, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 1, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RELLSTAB, District Judge.
The defendant in this suit, a corporation of the state of New York, moves to set aside the service of the summons and to dismiss the complaint, on the ground that this court is.without jurisdiction over the defendant.
The provisions of the 'New Jersey act concerning corporations (Rev. 1896), 2 Comp. Stat. N. J. p. 1592, applicable to foreign corporations of the character of the defendant, and pertinent to the present motion, require that they, “before transacting any business in this state, shall file in the office of the secretary of state a copy of its charter or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Electrical Equipment Company, Inc. v. Daniel Hamm Drayage Company, D/B/A Daniel Hamm CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Keller v. American Sales Book Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1936
- Ives v. G. R. Kinney Corp.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1957