Bell v. State

Rickman, Judge.

Following a bench trial, Fabian Bell was convicted on one count of financial *553transaction card theft. He filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court denied. Bell argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion because there was a fatal variance between the allegation and the evidence adduced at trial, and also erred in denying him the opportunity him to cross-examine trial counsel at the hearing on the new trial motion. We find no error and affirm.

On appeal from a bench trial resulting in a criminal conviction, we view all evidence in the light most favorable to…