Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 13, 1978No. 55349PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Where a criminal defendant bases his defense solely on misfortune or accident, is the trial court required to charge on this defense even absent a request to do so? Answering affirmatively, we must reverse the appellant’s burglary conviction and grant him a new trial.

Code § 26-602 provides: "A person shall not be found guilty of any crime committed by misfortune or accident where it satisfactorily appears there was no criminal scheme or undertaking, or intention, or criminal negligence.” Without detailing the evidence in this case, we note that the parties essentially agree that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Glaze v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. McRoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Whigham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Gunter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. State v. AmbuehlCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Metts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API