Legal Opinion

State v. Brusuelas

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 2009No. 27,107PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

{1} Dana Brusuelas (Defendant) appeals her conviction for possession of methamphetamine in violation of NMSA 1978, Section 30-31-23(D) (1990) (amended 2005). She raises two issues arising from the district court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence: (1) whether law enforcement officers may conduct warrantless searches of a probationer outside the direction of a probation officer or without the probationer’s consent, and (2) whether the law enforcement agents had reasonable suspicion that Defendant was committing or had committed a crime and that her vehicle or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. State v. Jason L.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. UriosteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HicksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. HicksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Alavez v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  5. MEA-MFT v. McCullochMontana Supreme Court · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API