Legal Opinion

Urbanek v. United States

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided October 31, 1994No. 92-7149-CIVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINAL JUDGMENT

ZLOCH, District Judge.

Plaintiff, August Urbanek, filed the instant action seeking a refund of federal income tax in the amount of $102,105 plus interest from the Defendant, United States of America, for the tax year ended December 31, 1984. The Court has jurisdiction over the instant action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1).

The sole question for this Court to decide is whether the Plaintiff may reduce his alternative minimum taxable income (“AMTI”) for the tax year ended December 31, 1984 by a regular tax net operating loss (“NOL”) carried back from the tax year ended 1987,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. First Chicago Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  3. First Chicago Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  4. Howard M. Weiser, and Lenore Weiser Robert J. And Helen M.L. Stein John McLeish and Nils Parson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Breakell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pekar v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999
  2. Paul J. Pekar v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999
  3. Pekar v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999
  4. Urbanek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Urbanek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API