Legal Opinion

Calamari v. Mary Immaculate Hospital

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1956PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDavid Kusnetz, J.

Defendant Mary Immaculate Hospital (hereinafter called the defendant) moves (1) for an order dismissing the third cause of action for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and (2) for an order requiring plaintiff to make more definite and certain the ninth and fifteenth causes of action.

On July 27,1953, plaintiff’s wife gave birth to a son who died five days later, on August 1, 1953, allegedly because of a blood condition known as erythroblastosis foetalis which stemmed from the fact that the infant’s father had a positive Eh blood factor while his mother had a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greco v. S. S. Kresge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Roche v. St. John's Riverside HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Roche v. St. John's Riverside HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Salamon v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij, N. V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. Griffin v. BlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zostautas v. St. Anthony De Padua HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API