Legal Opinion

Katz v. Katz

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 10, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCounihan, J.

This petition is brought by a wife against her husband in the Probate Court for the county of Plymouth under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 209, § 32, as amended in a manner not here material. The petition describes the petitioner as of Brockton in the county of Plymouth and the respondent as of Lynn, Essex County. By amendment the name of the city “Lynn” was struck out and in place thereof the name of the city of “Gary,” State of Indiana, was substituted. It contains the usual allegations that the respondent fails, without just cause, to furnish suitable support for the petitioner, that he has deserted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Birnbaum v. PamoukisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Richards v. ForrestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Goldston v. RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Schmidt v. SchmidtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marotta v. Board of Appeals of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  2. Madden v. MaddenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. Miller v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  4. Green v. COMMISSIONER OF CORPORATIONS & TAXATION.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Blitzer v. BlitzerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API