Legal Opinion

State v. Branam

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 27, 1983No. 82-844PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHAN, Judge.

Appellee was charged by information with burglary. Prior to the filing of the information, appellee had filed two pro se motions for speedy trial under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191. Approximately 75 days later, appellee, through counsel, filed a motion for discharge pursuant to rule 3.191 on grounds that appellee had not been brought to trial within 60 days of the filing of the foregoing pro se motions. The trial court granted appellee’s motion for discharge. We reverse.

A demand for speedy trial filed prior to the filing of an information is a nullity. State v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. GravleeSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. State v. HumphreyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. State v. LazarreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. State v. GauthierCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1989
  4. State v. HayesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API