Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dillon Williams v. State of Mississippi

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2017No. 2014-CT-01170-SCTPublished

1Concurrence

COLEMAN, JUSTICE,

CONCURRING:

¶ 8. I concur with the majority’s reasoning and conclusion that no merit can be found in Williams’s claim. I write separately because the Court never has properly addressed the effect of the codification of various bars to post-conviction relief, such as the two at issue today, on the fundamental-rights exception .to the procedural bars. Because the Legislature can only enact substantive law and may not enact procedural law in the form of bars to relief or any other, I would overrule Rowland v. State, 42 So.3d 503 (Miss. 2010), Rowland v. State, 98 So.3d 1032…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Read v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Rowland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Newell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Little v. Mississippi Department of TransportationMississippi Supreme Court · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API