Legal Opinion

Hansen v. White

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1988No. 17139PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

Pursuant to I.A.R. 12.1, the Ninth Circuit certified the following question to this Court:

Under Idaho law, have the county commissioners authority to institute a merit system binding county officers, particularly the sheriff, under which such officers may not terminate deputies and other employees in their department except for cause?

We conclude that a sheriff’s constitutional right to appoint deputies is not abridged where county commissioners institute a merit system prohibiting the dismissal of deputies without cause, so long as the merit system is reasonable under the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Watson v. Idaho Falls Consolidated Hospitals, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Harkness v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Ison v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  4. Metropolitan Government of Nashville v. PoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Sandpoint Convalescent Services, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allied Bail Bonds, Inc. v. County of KootenaiIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Fred Hansen, Joanne Hansen, Daryl Sparks and Betty Tueller v. Randall White and Bear Lake CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Hartman v. Canyon CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API