Legal Opinion

Finn v. Uddo

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1961No. 541Published

1Opinion of the Court

JANVIER, Judge.

Having supervisory jurisdiction as a result of the amendment of Paragraph 3, Section 29, Article VII of our Constitution, which amendment was effected by Act 561 of 1958, LSA, we directed alternative writs of prohibition and mandamus to the Judge of Section “A” of the First City Court of New Orleans in order that we might review a judgment of that Court in which the defendant had been denied an injunction to arrest the execution under an order of seizure and sale by executory process.

On the petition of plaintiff the said Court had issued an order of seizure and sale, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. AnzelmoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  2. Li Rocchi v. KeenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  3. Li Rocchi v. KeenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API