Legal Opinion · Dissent

Parnell v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. of Hartford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 10, 1975No. 74-854Published

1DissentMager, Judge

I must respectfully dissent because in my humble opinion the trial court’s order granting a partial summary judgment in favor of the defendants-appellees is in conflict with a long line of decisions construing the scope and application of the summary judgment remedy. Coquina Ridge Properties v. East West Company, Fla.App.1971, 255 So.2d 279; Schetter v. Jordan, Fla.App.1974, 294 So.2d 130; Krantz v. Donner, Fla.App. 1973, 285 So.2d 699; Allen v. Belcher, Fourth District Court of Appeal, 303 So.2d 55, opinion filed November 8, 1974; Ryskind v. Robinson, Fourth District Court of Appeal, 302…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northside Motors of Florida, Inc. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Nance v. BallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Automobile Sales, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Implement and Hardware Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  4. Coquina Ridge Properties v. East West CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  5. Schetter v. JordanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API