Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Haynes v. State, Department of Public Safety

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1993No. S-4677PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Danny Haynes was arrested for driving while intoxicated. Following his arrest, Haynes submitted to an “Intoximeter 3000” breath analysis, which chemically tests for the presence of alcohol. See AS 28.35.031 (“A person who operates or drives a motor vehicle in this state ... shall be considered to have given consent to a chemical test or tests of the person’s breath.... ”). The In-toximeter 3000 breath test produced a reading of .106 grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath. The Intoximeter 3000 has a recognized margin of error of .01…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Slagle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. State v. Marathon Oil CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. RuckerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Javed v. Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. KuhlNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Mangiapane v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1999
  4. Lemond v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
  5. Fraiman v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API