Legal Opinion
Corbett v. Kleinsmith
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 6, 1940No. 7948PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARANT, Circuit Judge.
Appellants brought suit against the First National ' Bank — Detroit,—in receivership since May 11, 1933, — to recover $15,066, an amount paid to Lucille Kleinsmith upon her forged endorsement of forty-six checks, drawn on the Bank by the McGiverin-Hal-dcman Company payable to the order of Vincent Corbett, Miss Kleinsmith’s employer. Miss Kleinsmith and the McGiv-erin-Haldeman Company were also defendants in the suit below. There is no substantial dispute as to the facts.
Vincent Corbett was sole manager of the Ravendale Subdivision in Detroit, owned by himself and his…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Bank of the Republic v. MillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Union Stock Yards Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. People's BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thack v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- Crosby v. Loudoun National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Agnes Dale Crosby v. The Loudoun National Bank of Leesburg, and the National Bank of Fairfax, Agnes Dale Crosby v. The Loudoun National Bank of Leesburg, Agnes Dale Crosby v. The Peoples National Bank of Leesburg, Agnes Dale Crosby v. The Peoples National Bank of Leesburg, and J. S. Buck, and Edward Beans and Henry Thompson, D/B/A Beans & ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956