Legal Opinion

In Re Stasson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 2010No. 09-BG-1327PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

On consideration of the order of the Michigan Attorney Discipline Board suspending respondent for a period of four years, with reinstatement conditioned on respondent’s showing of fitness to practice law, and directing payment of restitution and costs, see Grievance Administrator, Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Stasson, no. 07-165-GA (March 20, 2009), this court’s November 18, 2009, order that suspended respondent from the practice of law pending action of the court and directed her to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, the Statement of Bar Counsel…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re PelkeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. In Re MeadenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re StassonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API