Legal Opinion · Dissent

Weiner v. Weiner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1961Published

1Dissent

Eager, J. (dissenting).

In dissenting from such part of the order as sustains the. second alleged defense, I wish to make it clear that I concede that circumstances may exist which will move the court on theory of estoppel or other equitable considerations to deny relief to a plaintiff in this type of action. In this case, however, the facts pleaded in the second alleged affirmative defense, characterized by the defendant as “ apparent acquiescence ” of the plaintiff in the foreign decree of divorce, clearly do not constitute a sustainable defense. Certainly, the right of a spouse to urge the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gruttemeyer v. GruttemeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  2. Duffy v. DuffyNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Weiner v. WeinerNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API