Curti v. Ochodski
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of appellee, Victor M. Curti, Jr. We reverse.
Appellee commenced the instant action by filing a petition for rule to show cause why appellants, Theo M. Ochodski and Allegheny Mechanical Contracting, Inc. (AMC), should not be held in civil contempt. Curti and Ochodski had been co-owners of AMC and opposing litigants in a previous lawsuit concerning the dissolution of AMC. That suit was ended through a settlement agreement entered into by the parties and approved by the trial court in a consent order. When appellants refused to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Universal Builders Supply, Inc. v. Shaler Highlands Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Commonwealth v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Advanced Management Research, Inc. v. EmanuelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Maxton v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Ass'n v. ReganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3Cited by1 opinion
- Yackobovitz v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991