Legal Opinion

Curti v. Ochodski

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 1987No. 800PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of appellee, Victor M. Curti, Jr. We reverse.

Appellee commenced the instant action by filing a petition for rule to show cause why appellants, Theo M. Ochodski and Allegheny Mechanical Contracting, Inc. (AMC), should not be held in civil contempt. Curti and Ochodski had been co-owners of AMC and opposing litigants in a previous lawsuit concerning the dissolution of AMC. That suit was ended through a settlement agreement entered into by the parties and approved by the trial court in a consent order. When appellants refused to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Universal Builders Supply, Inc. v. Shaler Highlands Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Commonwealth v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Advanced Management Research, Inc. v. EmanuelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Maxton v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Ass'n v. ReganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yackobovitz v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API