Legal Opinion

United States v. Gallagher

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 4, 1925No. 2446PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Spruce and maple wood sawed into short lengths and partly down the middle was classifiéd by the collector of customs at the port of Chicago as wood not specially provided for, and assessed for duty at 20 per cent ad valorem under that part of paragraph 403 of the act of 1922, which reads as follows:

Par. 403. * * * Wood unmanufactured not specially provided for, 20 per centum ad valorem.

The importer protested that the merchandise was free of duty under section 201 and paragraph 1700 of the free list, which provisions in so far as pertinent read as follows:

Sec. 201. That on and after the day…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re E. W. Rathbun & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Altman v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. United States v. YoungCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. United States v. EmeryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  5. Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API