Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Fixel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1941No. Docket No. 108, Calendar No. 41,420PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.

The Plymouth Cooperage Company was organized under the laws of this State some time during the early part of the year 1934 for the purpose of engaging in the business of the manufacture of beer barrels. H. Armin Weil and Harry Freshman were the promoters, Mr. "Weil and members of his family being the principal stockholders.

The Plymouth Company acquired the assets of the Wolverine Wood Products, Inc., of Ann Arbor, moved the same to Plymouth and engaged in the business of the manufacture of beer barrels and the sale of its capital stock.

The business was far from profitable and stock sales…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Oviatt v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. EstesMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Kukla v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,641 Martin R. Goldman v. Bank of the Commonwealth, a Michigan Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  4. Mesh v. CitrinMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Two Men & a Truck/International Inc. v. Two Men & a Truck/Kalamazoo, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API