Legal Opinion

Steele v. Wiedemann Machine Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 20851PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CLARY, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for a new trial following a jury verdict in defendant’s favor. The action arose out of an injury suffered by plaintiff on August 21, 1953 while operating a turret punch press in the course of his employment at the Emsco Manufacturing Company in Houston, Texas. The press was manufactured by the defendant. After suit was instituted in this Court on grounds of diversity, Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332, the employer’s compensation carrier intervened as an additional plaintiff under provisions of the Texas Workmen’s Compensation…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richard John Steele, and Texas Employer's Insurance Association, Intervening v. Wiedemann MacHine Company, AndCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API