Legal Opinion

Streeter v. Graham & Norton Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, J.

The question presented involves the construction of section 23 of the Civil Practice Act. If the statute is applicable, the present action is maintainable, otherwise it must fail.

Plaintiff’s intestate, an employee of the United Metal Products Company, met his death in said employment on April 21, 1927. He left him surviving the plaintiff, his widow, and six children, five of whom, with the widow, were dependents under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Such dependents elected to take compensation, and by the provisions of section 29 of that law, the making of such award operated as an assignment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Hill v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Travelers Insurance v. Louis Padula Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Johnson v. . Phoenix Bridge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Buchholz v. United States Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  2. Graybar Electric Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Claim of Charles W. Ennis v. Kennedy Valve Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Data-Guide, Inc. v. American R. D. M. Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. In re the Appeal of Keep, New York County Courts1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API