Legal Opinion

Saenz v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 7, 1989No. 2 CA-SA 89-0140PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This special action requires us to revisit the issue of advising a DUI arrestee of his right to counsel and our prior decision in State v. Superior Court (Matthews), 158 Ariz. 500, 763 P.2d 996 (App.1988).

Petitioner was arrested on September 30, 1988, for driving under the influence, in violation of A.R.S. § 28-692(A), and it is apparently undisputed that he was given his Miranda warning. At the end of a 20-minute observation period, he was advised as follows:

Arizona law requires you to submit to and successfully complete a test to determine the alcohol or drug content of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kunzler v. Pima County Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. JuarezArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hiveley v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SherrillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. State v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API