Legal Opinion
STRANGE v. JUICE MAN
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided March 28, 2022No. 1:21-cv-04469Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CLINTON STRANGE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-04469-SDG GMR PROCESSING LLC and APE PROCESSING LLC, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment [ECF 36] and response to an order to show cause [ECF 41]. For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. Background Proceeding pro se, Plaintiff Clinton Strange initiated this action on December 14, 2020, in the United States District Court for the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- George Hamm v. Dekalb County, and Pat Jarvis, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.