Legal Opinion
Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Sutherlin
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided December 14, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-3281PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
McNAMARA, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court. The bankruptcy court found that the Appellant, Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Company (“FSLIC” or “Receiver”), the Receiver for Crescent Federal Savings Bank (“Crescent”), violated Bankruptcy Rule 9011 when FSLIC lodged an objection to discharge in the Appellee’s, Robert B. Sutherlin (“Sutherlin”), Discharge in Bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court assessed sanctions against FSLIC in the amount of $9,532.94 jointly and severally against FSLIC and Harry…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- 17 Collier bankr.cas.2d 743, Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,955 in the Matter of James P. Wood, M.D. And Carol B. Wood, Debtors. Dr. Arthur E. Wood, III v. Dr. James P. Wood, Carol Wood, Woodrow Barham & Wayne Clinic, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Brooks-HamiltonUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Sheridan v. MichelsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- In Re Brooks-HamiltonUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Sheridan v. Michels (In Re Sheridan)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004