Loblaw, Inc. v. New York State Board of Pharmacy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Goldman, J. (dissenting).
I cannot agree with, the determination reached by the majority that Bayer Aspirin is not a “ proprietary ” medicine within the meaning of section 6816 (subd. 2, par. c) of article 137 of the Education Law. I concur completely with Special Term’s conclusion in this respect. The exhaustive memorandum of Justice Motile in my view correctly sets forth the state of the authorities in New York and all other jurisdictions on the subject and no good purpose can be served by repeating what he has so ably written.
In my judgment Bayer Aspirin is a proprietary medicine within the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Defiance Milk Products Co. v. Du MondNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- People v. . GillsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Weaver v. Palmer Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- California Apparel Creators v. Wieder of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.