Legal Opinion

Wakem & McLaughlin, Inc. v. Royal Indemnity Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 13, 1926No. Gen. No. 30,660PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitch

This appeal is from a judgment for $7,315.91, in favor of plaintiff, upon a policy of burglary insurance issued by defendant. The policy provides that defendant agrees to indemnify plaintiff:

“For all direct loss * * * from within the premises hereinafter defined, of merchandise, furniture, fixtures and equipment, by burglary committed by any person or persons who shall have made an unlawful entry into such premises, by force and violence, when such premises are not open for business, at the place of which entry there shall be visible marks of such entry made by the use of tools, explosives,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Swanson, Inc. v. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  2. Julian Foundry Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  3. Milkes v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  4. City of Chicago v. SantorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Rauworth v. Commercial Insurance Co. of NewarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API