Legal Opinion

Chattanooga Railway & Light Co. v. Wallace

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1919No. 9945PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action for damages; from Walker superior court—Judge Wright. April 25, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

1. As to a trespasser on the track of a railroad company it is a general rule that the duty of observing ordinary care and diligence for his protection does not devolve upon the company’s agents in charge of a train, 'until his presence upon the track becomes known to them, but where the circumstances are such that they are bound on a given occasion to anticipate that a person may be upon the track at a certain place, they are under a duty to take such precautions to prevent injury as would satisfy .the requirements of ordinary care and diligence. Western. & Atlantic R. Co. v. Davis, 21 Ga.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pope v. Seaboard Air-Line RailwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BridwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Ellis v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API